3 ms·
17.5kya lanka was part of the indian landmass according to the article due to sea level differences rest of your nit picking i will ignore since you seem to ha
by dzhshnacct 8y ago
17.5kya lanka was part of the indian landmass according to the article due to sea level differences
rest of your nit picking i will ignore since you seem to have accepted and not disputed the main claim of lankan agri well before the fertile crescent
- iamshs 8y ago>17.5kya lanka was part of the indian landmass according to the article due to sea level differences Any other independent source for it?