3 ms·
You'll notice the tag-line for the blog is “Digital Humanities: Using tools from the 1990s to answer questions from the 1960s about 19th century America.” That
by igravious 8y ago
You'll notice the tag-line for the blog is “Digital Humanities: Using tools from the 1990s to answer questions from the 1960s about 19th century America.”
That's what I've been doing for the last half a decade, Digital Humanities (DH). DH is what you get when you ask yourself, “What happens when you add computational methods to the scholar's toolkit? What kind of questions can you ask? What does it imply for scholarship in the Humanities?”
That's one thing that's happening. And it's a good thing. At my uni (a second-tier uni in Western Europe) we have an undergrad program four years old which combines elements of CS (mainly the non-theoretical stuff) with subjects of the students own choosing from the Arts. I believe that within a decade all higher-level institutions will offers programs like this. The Arts & Humanities is undergoing a paradigm shift the likes of which it hasn't experienced in decades, perhaps even centuries. Only those with backgrounds in the humanities are going to be able to write this new chapter in the story of human learning and understanding.
Another thing that's happening. The economy. That's maybe not an unrelated issue. Are there going to be jobs that people will be rewarded for if they get degrees in the humanities? Not in this economic climate. I don't know if people recognise my handle here (probably not) but my area is philosophy. I can see that people are crying out for philosophical instruction. I just attended a Jordan B. Peterson / Sam Harris live event where 8,500 eager souls turned up. You know what a tenured philosopher of a decent institution said when I enquired of a table of philosophers about Peterson, “Oh, that idiot from Toronto.” Academic philosophy is failing philosophy. Could the same be true of other arts and humanities subjects?
Academic institutions are as politically biased if not more so as the rest of society. And these are the people we are looking to for direction in our lives? I've been saying this for the last while but it is my conjecture that the humanities is broken to exactly the same extent and the same degree that philosophy has lost its way in the last century.
What I'm trying to say is, the crisis in the humanities is deep problem. It is related to the current economic situation, to the current political situation, it's an institutional problem, it's an epistemological problem, it's related to the current cultural climate – ultimately it's a philosophical problem.
Final note (though I could write a lot more) – the culture war between the arts and the sciences goes back nearly 150 years (I've researched this) so this has been brewing for an extremely long time. There have been multiple times in the past when the humanities were in the dominant position and the sciences the reverse so make of that what you will.
- pjc50 8y agoPeterson is telling people what they want to hear, which is why he has an audience. He's not carrying out a sincere inquiry into philosophical truth. Same difference as why newspapers have an astrology column not an astronomy one.
- igravious 8y agoThat's off-topic so I'm not responding.
- mancerayder 8y agoPeterson is telling people what they want to hear, which is why he has an audience. He's not carrying out a sincere inquiry into philosophical truth. What people want to hear is condemnation of de-platforming, shouting down and other behaviors new to the last decade or two in academia. He's also not a philosopher, he's a psychiatrist. His comments around the postmodernist influence in the Humanities and the cultural effects - right or wrong - are a fascinating topic of debate quite relevant to this thread.
- gillesjacobs 8y agoI am doing a PhD in natural language processing coming from an undergrad study Literature and Linguistics, and I can relate. I gave up on the humanities very early on because of the blind activism in research and the classroom at the cost of methodology. I moved into NLP and ML research. One literary history professor put it blatantly and honestly when talking about teaching in the humanities: "Academia for us is a way to instill our ideology in the elite of society." More propaganda than science. I too hope the appreciation of empiricism gets better with the (re-)introduction of data-driven and computational methods.