3 ms·

> Why would that be a good thing? Or rather, a better thing than the current situation? Why would that even be desirable? Because wealth inequality is massivel

> Why would that be a good thing? Or rather, a better thing than the current situation? Why would that even be desirable? Because wealth inequality is massively harmful for society. It's the sort of thing that leads to revolution. > If you believe e.g. that company equity should be more uniformly distributed, go talk to your congressman, have him draft a law to that effect and get congress to vote on it. and then Google writes him a check and the whole thing goes away. Biggest lobbyist around.

ur-whale 8y ago
> Because wealth inequality is massively harmful for society. Nope. Hunger, poverty, lack of education, lack of access to medical care, etc.. is harmful to society and leads to revolutions and whatever root cause leads to those is to be fought against. Except that wealth inequality isn't such a root cause. Wealth inequality isn't and has never been a problem except in the minds of utopian ideologues, collectivists or people with a basic jealousy problem.
- jazzyjackson 8y ago
  You're pretty dismissive of a theory I find interesting, I wonder if you've ever really entertained the idea that a wealthy country will cater its services to those who can pay, leaving those who can't pay behind. So USA has a high median income, so we have high education outcomes, high healthcare outcomes, right? We certainly have the best schools and the best hospitals. But only the top few percentile can afford the best schools and best hospitals, everyone else gets left behind. But we have higher infant mortality than many countries with lower incomes, and we don't compete so well when it comes to average assessment scores. Naturally I was exposed to this thinking via a TED talk years ago, from this guy: https://www.ted.com/talks/richard_wilkinson https://www.ted.com/talks/richard_wilkinson Maybe you want to offer a rebuttal, or maybe you just want to insist he's jealous.
- stuckinarut 8y ago
  > Wealth inequality isn't and has never been a problem except in the minds of utopian ideologues, collectivists or people with a basic jealousy problem "Let them eat cake"
  - ur-whale 8y ago
    Cheap shot, unworthy of HN. > Hunger, poverty, lack of education, lack of access to medical care, etc... All of these woes were in play at that time. Unlike the poster above who showed a source that tries (and fails imo) to show causation between wealth inequality and said woes, you provided exactly zero value to the conversation. Good job.

ur-whale 8y ago

> Because wealth inequality is massively harmful for society. Nope. Hunger, poverty, lack of education, lack of access to medical care, etc.. is harmful to society and leads to revolutions and whatever root cause leads to those is to be fought against. Except that wealth inequality isn't such a root cause. Wealth inequality isn't and has never been a problem except in the minds of utopian ideologues, collectivists or people with a basic jealousy problem.

jazzyjackson 8y ago
You're pretty dismissive of a theory I find interesting, I wonder if you've ever really entertained the idea that a wealthy country will cater its services to those who can pay, leaving those who can't pay behind. So USA has a high median income, so we have high education outcomes, high healthcare outcomes, right? We certainly have the best schools and the best hospitals. But only the top few percentile can afford the best schools and best hospitals, everyone else gets left behind. But we have higher infant mortality than many countries with lower incomes, and we don't compete so well when it comes to average assessment scores. Naturally I was exposed to this thinking via a TED talk years ago, from this guy: https://www.ted.com/talks/richard_wilkinson https://www.ted.com/talks/richard_wilkinson Maybe you want to offer a rebuttal, or maybe you just want to insist he's jealous.
stuckinarut 8y ago
> Wealth inequality isn't and has never been a problem except in the minds of utopian ideologues, collectivists or people with a basic jealousy problem "Let them eat cake"
- ur-whale 8y ago
  Cheap shot, unworthy of HN. > Hunger, poverty, lack of education, lack of access to medical care, etc... All of these woes were in play at that time. Unlike the poster above who showed a source that tries (and fails imo) to show causation between wealth inequality and said woes, you provided exactly zero value to the conversation. Good job.