3 ms·
>Most OSM commentary focuses on unimportant minutiae (layers, for goodness’ sake, as if it’s still 2004) What's wrong with having layers on a digital map? I ca
by TuringTest 8y ago
>Most OSM commentary focuses on unimportant minutiae (layers, for goodness’ sake, as if it’s still 2004)
What's wrong with having layers on a digital map? I can see the problem of not having them.
- doombolt 8y agoIt's not hard to render OpenStreetMap in such fashion that there are layers. I don't understand what kind of explicit support is needed here.
- maxerickson 8y agoThe cited context is about segmenting data for editing, where right now everything shares one context. For display and most others uses, the data is processed to create convenient layers.