Monopolies are bad because more capital means that you can create a better product? If beating Google was as simple as needing more money to build a better pro

Monopolies are bad because more capital means that you can create a better product? If beating Google was as simple as needing more money to build a better product, then why couldn't startups just pitch that to investors and raise more funding? Probably because beating Google is harder than throwing money at a random startup's app. At that rate you might as well outlaw venture capital funds because they disadvantage people trying to bootstrap their own startup. There are certainly many reasons why monopolies are bad, but having capital is not one of them.