3 ms·
That narrative is unacceptable to power structures that rule through fear. If people really internalized the fact that (for one example) a person in the UK is m
by GW150914 8y ago
That narrative is unacceptable to power structures that rule through fear. If people really internalized the fact that (for one example) a person in the UK is more likely to die from swallowing a bee than through terrorism, many totalitarian policies would be undermined. Likewise if most Brits accepted that it’s riskier riding a horse than taking MDMA, the war on drugs would suffer.
Fear is just such a useful tool to keep people moving in the general direction you want that politicians and plutocrats will not give it up, and niether will marketers. Meanwhile the media has generally embraced sensationalism and fear for a very very long time. People are inculcated into a culture of fear to sell shit, to control them, to siphon money from them, and who’s left to show them the way out?
The prototypical example is that so many people fear flying commercially, yet don’t blink at getting into their cars to drive.
- lainga 8y agoI think that's the thrust of this whole situation. When people say "that should be illegal," it's because they're so accustomed to the idea of an all-encompassing, all-regulating government, that they can see no other outlet for their anger than to suggest new criminal laws.
- jessaustin 8y agoIn many cases the motivating emotion isn't anger, but jealousy. Others live as they wish they had permission to live.
- kwhitefoot 8y agoBut in fact they do have permission to live as others do. But they lack the nerve or the means.