What garbage. I can't even make sense of the author's point, it's so diluted with random asides and free-association tangents (poincare, etc). Perhaps we shoul

What garbage. I can't even make sense of the author's point, it's so diluted with random asides and free-association tangents (poincare, etc). Perhaps we should start by defining terms. What is "unconscious," and what is "thought." Depending on how you define that, visual processing, dreaming, operant-conditioning, all fall into that category. There is also strong peer-reviewed evidence that our mind is constantly reviewing what we have just learned, and interrupting this will inhibit our learning. Perhaps the author should discuss that [1]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interference_theory#Retroactive_interference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interference_theory#Retroactiv...