4 ms·
This is a lovely story, and I enjoyed reading it. I'm not sure the infection of haemophiliacs from blood products should be compared to Grenfell. Unlike alumi
by dm319 8y ago
This is a lovely story, and I enjoyed reading it.
I'm not sure the infection of haemophiliacs from blood products should be compared to Grenfell. Unlike aluminium cladding on a skyscraper, patients took factor concentrate on specific medical advice to treat bleeds that would otherwise not have stopped.
These factor concentrates required hundreds of blood transfusions to make just a small amount (they were also highly expensive, and still are today, shots can easily cost several thousands of pounds each), and they were given to treat bleeds, which were life-threatening or limb-threatening. In younger children and severe haemophiliacs they had to be given factor regularly to prevent bleeds.
The enquiry will need to look at how the pharmaceutical/product companies and health organisations dealt with incoming information, and whether they had a viable alternative at the time. There is suggestion that the UK producer of factor concentrate (BPL) was highly underfunded at the time, and unable to produce the required amount of factor concentrate to supply the country.
There is a UK public enquiry ongoing to assess whether someone or some organisation should hold responsibility for it - and I agree it is overdue.
- jacquesm 8y agoIt is not about quantity, it is about process. If they had not mingled the blood of thousands of individuals the damage would have been far, far less. Of course more - smaller - batches would have been more costly.
- dm319 8y agoIt's a chemical fractionation process [1] on thousands of litres of blood plasma, and that's how it is still done today for those products which aren't produced by recombinant DNA. But these days there are repeated health screens and viral testing on both the donors and batches, as well as solvent-treating/ultra-filtering the products. Maybe it is possible to process in smaller batches, but I suspect that is down the the facility producing it, and the issue was the that UK weren't able to increase their in-house production at the time. [1] http://www.penroseinquiry.org.uk/finalreport/text/354876_chapter_19.html http://www.penroseinquiry.org.uk/finalreport/text/354876_cha...