No. That is why 90% of all humans should have 2 children, and 10% should have 3. Or at least until large-scale space colonization becomes viable, then everyon

No. That is why 90% of all humans should have 2 children, and 10% should have 3. Or at least until large-scale space colonization becomes viable, then everyone can just go wild until the Dyson sphere fills all the way in. A government health service should therefore not be cutting off fertility services any earlier than the live birth of anyone's second child, and should likely begin requiring additional fees for all child-related services starting with the fourth, or impose an additional tax on anyone with four or more biological children. China's "one child" policy would probably have fared better as a "one son" policy. That equates to an average limit of two children per person, which is still below replacement fertility.