4 ms·
Well, that’s because due to compatibility we still have the old way of doing things alongside the new ways of doing things plus the multiple future-now way of d
by goliatone 8y ago
Well, that’s because due to compatibility we still have the old way of doing things alongside the new ways of doing things plus the multiple future-now way of doing things. JavaScript recently has been moving fast both from a community and committee perspective. However, I think is nowhere near as bad as C++ where you can do similar things is different ways with big nuances on end results.