3 ms·
Sorry, here's a cached copy: http://erewhon.superkuh.com/library/Space/Spacecraft/Debris%20Engine_%20A%20Potential%20Thruster%20for%20Space%20Debris%20Removal_%
by bumholio 8y ago
Sorry, here's a cached copy: http://erewhon.superkuh.com/library/Space/Spacecraft/Debris%20Engine_%20A%20Potential%20Thruster%20for%20Space%20Debris%20Removal_%20Lei%20Lan_%20Jingyang%20Li_%20Hexi%20Baoyin_%20arxiv151107246.pdf http://erewhon.superkuh.com/library/Space/Spacecraft/Debris%...
Regardless of any redaction errors, the basic idea is sound. While the particle engine is not able to produce the large impulse of ion drives (low specific ionization), it turns out the optimal impulse for such an application is in the 100-200 range. Any higher and the thrust drops too much prolonging the mission duration, for a given amount of electric power available.
For this application the opposite is true: you want maximize thrust and throw away the full mass of the previous target before reaching the next one to be consumed.
- acqq 8y ago“Regardless of any redaction errors, the basic idea is sound.” As far as I know the basic physics, the whole energy for the movement would still NOT come from the crushed satellite pieces but from some energy source in the satellite destroyer.
- bumholio 8y agoOf course, it's electric propulsion so most likey solar. But the unlimited propellant mass allows for a much higher thrust than typical for satellites and quick (days, weeks) orbital hops.