3 ms·
This is how I view it: * Being open source protects against a malicious developer. Otherwise there is nothing preventing him to build the binary with a differe
by mihaifm 8y ago
This is how I view it:
* Being open source protects against a malicious developer. Otherwise there is nothing preventing him to build the binary with a different source, and send the passwords to his own server.
* Signed code archive prevents against a compromised hosting site.
- perl4ever 8y agoIn order to get from a trusted source to a trusted binary, you have to trust the compiler and its dependencies as well, I think.