3 ms·

Not specifically overhead, but there are general benchmarks covering a variety of situations: https://blog.apnic.net/2018/01/29/measuring-quic-vs-tcp-mobile-des

• topspin 8y ago
  Thank you for that. Very informative.
• omginternets 8y ago
  Thanks for this. It's very informative, even though it's not the packet-level analysis I was initially looking for. >However, we observed that QUIC performs significantly worse than TCP when the network reorders packets (Figure 2). >Upon investigating the QUIC code, we found that in the presence of packet reordering, QUIC falsely infers that packets have been lost, while TCP detects packet reordering and increases its NACK threshold. Under what conditions does packet ordering usually occur? From the looks of the figures, it seems like packet-reordering is a function of the x-axis value (rate-limit of some sort?). What's going on here? Does anybody know?