I'd prefer they be honest about what they're doing, which is complaining that others don't agree with them politically and then attempting to shame them into su

I'd prefer they be honest about what they're doing, which is complaining that others don't agree with them politically and then attempting to shame them into submission. But instead of admitting this, they use phrasing like “Microsoft is complicit in profiting from a violent and murderous mass incarceration and deportation scheme" (quoted from the article). Thus they present anyone that disagrees with them as promoters of "violence and murderous mass incarceration", obviously informing you how they are the good guys and anyone that disagrees with them is an evil force that must be stopped. Regardless of my stance on an issue like this, I strongly disagree that this is the way to resolve it, calling anyone who disagrees with you a violent murderer.