3 ms·
Its superficial to suppose the immediacy of slack is its only feature. The reality is that email fails to serve the purpose for complex discussions that involv
by wokwokwok 8y ago
Its superficial to suppose the immediacy of slack is its only feature.
The reality is that email fails to serve the purpose for complex discussions that involve many people, especially when you're using a rubbish email system like outlook.
Another form, be it meetings, chat, forum, whatever is required for this... and to be fair, gmail and the like offer some form of searching and sorting nested threads...
...but your complaint is broadly the same as the argument against having meetings in general.
Certainly, it is an oppinion, but not helpful or realistic.
Slack is disruptive, but 'just use email' isn't the answer.
- philwelch 8y agoOutlook may very well be shit, but that’s largely because business/enterprise email products are optimized for the same PowerPoint-addled minds that Slack is. Rich text is where email first started to go wrong. Seriously, go read the lkml archives sometime, and go tell the authors of one of the most important and high quality pieces of foundational software in the world that they would be better served with something like Slack.