> Facebook could open a restaurant in the center. How would that work for a huge complex like the Googleplex? They'd have to provide public access to all part

> Facebook could open a restaurant in the center. How would that work for a huge complex like the Googleplex? They'd have to provide public access to all parts of their complex to comply. > So for example, it could charge the public that walks in 1 million a meal. Not a lawyer, but I think that will break the law. Otherwise, "public access" will become completely meaningless: if I don't like you, all items on the menu are no $1m, and of course you cannot stay on premise without ordering... I'd love to hear a real lawyer analyzing this, but imho, both your suggestions constitute attempts to completely circumvent a law based on technicalities, which is a dangerous game to play when you're a corporation with offices in the jurisdiction of the legislative body you're trying to circumvent. Your simple solution will also not work for very large businesses (due to the need to open up their entire campus for public access), nor small ones (who can't afford the cost in funds and labor of creating a separate public-access restaurant). In my estimation, this will make any company think twice about starting a big office in MTV.