2 ms·
So you're saying that you believe that governments should begin imposing censorship laws on privately held companies (a foreign one in this case) because withou
by commandlinefan 8y ago
So you're saying that you believe that governments should begin imposing censorship laws on privately held companies (a foreign one in this case) because without censorship, people who were susceptible to being convinced to do something were convinced to do so? And you really don't see the problem with that?
- dane-pgp 8y agoI'm not suggesting that governments should decide what is and isn't misleading, or that they should restrict campaigns to only "approved" messages. Preventing foreign companies (and governments) from influencing British elections might be worth considering, though: http://uk.businessinsider.com/theresa-may-russia-putin-fake-news-war-elections-2017-11 http://uk.businessinsider.com/theresa-may-russia-putin-fake-... Ultimately it is the job of the British people to decide which claims (in political advertising bought transparently by British people) are misleading. To do this, I think it would be helpful if political campaigns had to also publish in a centralised register, up front, all the political messages they paid for. There may even be a case for preventing political campaigns from targeting people based on individual psychological profiles, as opposed to geographically focused campaigns, or based on the demographics of a specific newspaper or television channel.