3 ms·
I knew once I posted it that someone would suggest using a block chain. The problem with the block chain is privacy. Publishing people’s votes can and will hav
by enzanki_ars 8y ago
I knew once I posted it that someone would suggest using a block chain.
The problem with the block chain is privacy. Publishing people’s votes can and will have a huge impact on their life. It would also make buying votes much easier.
A block chain solution would have to find a way to ensure that only valid voters can place a vote, ensure that only people that could vote were the only people that placed a vote after the fact, and ensure that none of this can be tied to a real identity. Otherwise, either bad actors could place votes, or a complete voting record for a person is published.
Solve all of the above, and a block chain may be an acceptable way to go, though it would be a waste of energy in my mind compared to a normal database, which could easily be exported with only the vote and signature stating it was a valid and verified vote for a person.
In the end, we have just made something more complicated than a paper ballot, which has been shown to be reasonably secure against foreign and/or national actors attempting to influence an election, except in already corrupt nations, especially those without term limits...
- rusk 8y agoA distributed ledger with an entry for every single voter who gets to move their single “token” from one column to another column with their selection. Roll it up and there’s your result. Enough bits and everyone can have their own token that is unique, anonymous and secure. The argument about corrupt regimes is a nonstarter cause you’ve got bigger problems.