4 ms·
Horrible? Sure it's not ideal, but it allows carriers to go IPv6-only on their internal networks. Mobile carriers already put all IPv4 traffic behind a NAT, so
by mrpippy 8y ago
Horrible? Sure it's not ideal, but it allows carriers to go IPv6-only on their internal networks. Mobile carriers already put all IPv4 traffic behind a NAT, so this isn't a step backwards.
For most users, the transition will happen via dual-stack (where the customer runs their own IPv4 NAT), not NAT64.