> I'd rather read about the technology, with detailed illustrations of dissected engines and graphs and all the interesting details, rather than read yet anothe

> I'd rather read about the technology, with detailed illustrations of dissected engines and graphs and all the interesting details, rather than read yet another description of a yet another postdoc's day in the lab. I personally like both, but I wouldn't go seeking hard tech and science from Bloomberg Businessweek. It's a good publication, but hard, detailed science is not it's MO, and never was. It's like a series of pointers to hard science subjects (if that happens to be among the subjects) for business minds and investors. It covers politics as well, but it's stated purpose is how these matters reflect on the business world, not overly concerned with details of policy unless they affect the subject of business. Occasionally they have more hard-hitting pieces, but for the most part, that's what it is. I think that's a good thing. The many people decrying "watered down journalism" and that there are too few technical details here, are really missing the forest for the trees.