3 ms·
>overwhelmingly dominant in all major outlets. You can find some niche science-heavy writing, but they are so unpopular that they don't have any of the resource
by rory096 8y ago
>overwhelmingly dominant in all major outlets. You can find some niche science-heavy writing, but they are so unpopular that they don't have any of the resources of the major newspapers.
What sort of resources? NASASpaceflight.com is one of the best space news sites around (along with SpaceNews.com) and it does it on subscription revenue for a private section of its forum (yes, a phpBB-style forum) and a smidge of ad revenue.
Meanwhile, CNN has all the resources in the world and this is what we get: https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1022246752861282305 https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/status/10222467528612823...
- jessriedel 8y agoI think you're speaking to my point? The higher quality reporting is rarer and stuck with way fewer resources.
- rory096 8y agoI guess my question is: what's the downside to not having those resources?
- jessriedel 8y agoI predict NASASpaceflight.com and SpaceNews.com would give you a laundry list of types and depths of coverage they would provide if given only a bit more money. You don't see all the good stuff you're not getting.