4 ms·
It is damning circumstantial evidence, for sure. But only circumstantial, that is troubling (but there is precedence for convictions on circumstantial evidence
by michaelneale 19y ago
It is damning circumstantial evidence, for sure. But only circumstantial, that is troubling (but there is precedence for convictions on circumstantial evidence of course).
- tptacek 19y agoWhere by precedence, you mean to say "multiple centuries of jurisprudence built around it". There is nothing wrong with circumstantial evidence.
- michaelneale 19y agoOf course, its just that inside all of us, there is a conspiracy theorist that thinks anything could be a set up ;)