3 ms·
Yeah actually I stead of so much focus on frameworks it's better to focus on better polyfill implementations. It's only a temporary issue in many cases but the
by shams93 8y ago
Yeah actually I stead of so much focus on frameworks it's better to focus on better polyfill implementations. It's only a temporary issue in many cases but the larger web does move slowly and then stardards like web components sometimes take a deacde or more to be fully baked. Wasm based polyfill would enable more browser maker innovation and competition without leading to slow and bloared pages for all but one device.
- Spivak 8y agoWhat's the point of polyfilling a nice API when you could just have a nice API to start with which leverages native functions when present? They don't seem to be philosophically different. Or stated differently, "jQuery is just a JS polyfill for browsers that don't support native jQuery yet."