5 ms·
there is no evidence that second hand smoke is dangerous, so don't worry about it.
by xlnt 18y ago
there is no evidence that second hand smoke is dangerous, so don't worry about it.
- rms 18y ago>there is no evidence that second hand smoke is dangerous, so don't worry about it. regardless of what studies may have said or not said, it seems obvious that it is not good.
- xlnt 18y agoit's not obvious that it's significant. we shouldn't waste our time worrying about tiny things. for example there is uranium in the ocean. it's a lot as an absolute figure. but it's very dilute, nothing to worry about.
- rms 18y agohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_smoking http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_smoking Please refute. Good luck. If you're basing your post on a Penn and Teller Bullshit episode, they now say they were wrong. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrub3dt7R5U http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrub3dt7R5U
- xlnt 18y agopick one study or argument, which is the best, and i'll look into it more carefully. the wikipedia article is lengthy, and contains errors, but if i point one out you will presumably say there's another part that's better. that's fine, but let's skip that step and go straight to the part you wish to stand behind.
- rms 18y agoDoesn't seem worth the effort for something I'm really convinced is right beyond a shadow of a doubt. I don't even think being proven wrong could convince me to change. It seems like a good idea for society to say bad things about tobacco. I'll leave the argument at "fix the wikipedia article."
- mynameishere 18y agoregardless of what studies may have said or not said, Good one. I like that honest approach to inquiry: Fuck science.