4 ms·

I don't have any data to back this up, but I imagine in almost every case where someone is convicted of murder and sentenced to 25 years in prison, there is act

• michaelneale 18y ago
  It is damning circumstantial evidence, for sure. But only circumstantial, that is troubling (but there is precedence for convictions on circumstantial evidence of course).
  • tptacek 18y ago
    Where by precedence, you mean to say "multiple centuries of jurisprudence built around it". There is nothing wrong with circumstantial evidence.
    • michaelneale 18y ago
      Of course, its just that inside all of us, there is a conspiracy theorist that thinks anything could be a set up ;)