>Could be true, I guess. Everyone has "perspective" about what is important. That still doesn't seem to be a reason to disbelieve a fact checker It gives reaso

>Could be true, I guess. Everyone has "perspective" about what is important. That still doesn't seem to be a reason to disbelieve a fact checker It gives reason to doubt based on a known political bias. >How exactly does that have overtones of centrally enforced authority? Because it implies one is unable to determine truths and falsehoods for themselves