13 ms·

Um, we have settled the Gobi Desert and there's plenty of ways to make it pay, most notably this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oyu_Tolgoi_mine https://en.

• stickfigure 8y ago
  This is a good illustration of what Charlie Stross says: But even so, when you get down to it, there's not really any economically viable activity on the horizon for people to engage in that would require them to settle on a planet or asteroid and live there for the rest of their lives. In general, when we need to extract resources from a hostile environment we tend to build infrastructure to exploit them (such as oil platforms) but we don't exactly scurry to move our families there. Rather, crews go out to work a long shift, then return home to take their leave. After all, there's no _there_ there — just a howling wilderness of north Atlantic gales and frigid water that will kill you within five minutes of exposure. And that, I submit, is the closest metaphor we'll find for interplanetary colonization. Most of the heavy lifting more than a million kilometres from Earth will be done by robots, overseen by human supervisors who will be itching to get home and spend their hardship pay. This is not "settling" the Gobi desert any more than manning an oil rig is settling the north atlantic. Much more well-reasoned detail here: http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2007/06/the_high_frontier_redux.html http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2007/06/the_high...