4 ms·

Is there a chance that we are over thinking this in the hope for a complex golden bullet when in reality the problem is simply eating more calories that we burn

Is there a chance that we are over thinking this in the hope for a complex golden bullet when in reality the problem is simply eating more calories that we burn For this to be true, it would have to be true that the millions of people struggling with weight, and the tens of thousands of researchers in the field, are all simply idiots who are not as smart as you. The people who say "Calories In < Calories Out, it's simple" are about as helpful as the client or exec who says "It's just code, change the code and don't write as many bugs. It's simple"

allover 8y ago
> For this to be true, it would have to be true that the millions of people struggling with weight, and the tens of thousands of researchers in the field, are all simply idiots who are not as smart as you. There's no need to leap to 'idiocy', it could mean the people struggling with weight have either poor willpower, or honestly don't know how to eat well. You can see this by watching shows like 'Secret Eaters' and seeing how incredibly common it is that people are over-eating and just don't realise it. And researchers will research wherever there's funding/academic opportunity.
- imsofuture 8y ago
  So the big difference between 100 years ago and now is people have less knowledge and less willpower?
  - allover 8y ago
    Well I didn't say anything about 'between 100 years ago and now', so no. Clearly a lot of factors have changed in 100 years, like our now abundant, convenient sources of calorie-dense food, and sedentary lifestyles, which mean our knowledge and willpower are now more significant than they were then.
imsofuture 8y ago
Completely agree. Calories in/out is a gross oversimplification. It's not wrong, it's just not particularly relevant. One thing I thought Taubes did a good job of was illustrating the relationship between calories in and calories out: your body will burn more calories when it has them, and less when it doesn't. You will be hungrier when you burn more calories, and less hungry when you don't. Calories in isn't just a knob you can adjust without consequence, your body is complicated.
6cd6beb 8y ago
>it would have to be true that (they) ... are all simply idiots who are not as smart as you. Peer pressure and advertising allow for many other possible explanations.

allover 8y ago

> For this to be true, it would have to be true that the millions of people struggling with weight, and the tens of thousands of researchers in the field, are all simply idiots who are not as smart as you. There's no need to leap to 'idiocy', it could mean the people struggling with weight have either poor willpower, or honestly don't know how to eat well. You can see this by watching shows like 'Secret Eaters' and seeing how incredibly common it is that people are over-eating and just don't realise it. And researchers will research wherever there's funding/academic opportunity.

imsofuture 8y ago
So the big difference between 100 years ago and now is people have less knowledge and less willpower?
- allover 8y ago
  Well I didn't say anything about 'between 100 years ago and now', so no. Clearly a lot of factors have changed in 100 years, like our now abundant, convenient sources of calorie-dense food, and sedentary lifestyles, which mean our knowledge and willpower are now more significant than they were then.

imsofuture 8y ago

Completely agree. Calories in/out is a gross oversimplification. It's not wrong, it's just not particularly relevant. One thing I thought Taubes did a good job of was illustrating the relationship between calories in and calories out: your body will burn more calories when it has them, and less when it doesn't. You will be hungrier when you burn more calories, and less hungry when you don't. Calories in isn't just a knob you can adjust without consequence, your body is complicated.

6cd6beb 8y ago

>it would have to be true that (they) ... are all simply idiots who are not as smart as you. Peer pressure and advertising allow for many other possible explanations.