2 ms·
> but that one is a lame reason: as much as we hurt Earth, it will remain much more habitable than Mars If we stopped using all fossil fuels TODAY (as well as
by ryanmercer 8y ago
> but that one is a lame reason: as much as we hurt Earth, it will remain much more habitable than Mars
If we stopped using all fossil fuels TODAY (as well as eliminated the cattle and hog industries), as in every single person on the planet, it would a few thousand years to return to pre-industrial revolution levels of CO2. We're realistically looking at a MINIMUM of 6ft increase in sea level before the end of the century (bye-bye most coastal cities unless you ring every last inch of coast with dikes). We are rapidly depleting aquifers the world around (much faster than they can replenish), we're rapidly depleting soil (creating appreciable amounts of topsoil takes centuries), population is still climbing, electricity demand the world around is climbing, someone is producing a banned ozone depleting compound ( https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/05/it-seems-someone-is-producing-a-banned-ozone-depleting-chemical-again/ https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/05/it-seems-someone-is-... ) etc.
It's not a lame reason, it is an extremely valid one. We need to develop the technology and means to have self-sustaining colonies (even if enclosed in habitats) off of Earth before stuff gets so bad here we simply don't have the resources to commit to doing such.
- iamforreal 8y agoA supervolcano eruption, nuclear winter, or large asteroid impact would still leave the earth more habitable than Mars. We're a long way from being Venus
- ryanmercer 8y agoTech developed for off-world colonies can be used on earth...