3 ms·
Yes, that's right – because it _is_ insecure, fundamentally. These sites will continue to be entirely accessible, so I have no idea what solution you think is
by matthewmacleod 8y ago
Yes, that's right – because it _is_ insecure, fundamentally.
These sites will continue to be entirely accessible, so I have no idea what solution you think is required. If a provider wants to upgrade such that their site is no longer insecure, then they can pay to upgrade it themselves.
- mynewaccount0 8y agoThis is absolutely, entirely wrong. It's so wrong that I need to wonder why you don't even realize you're wrong. A HTTP website with my GPG-signed data is _more_ secure than an HTTPS website. Relying on a CA is not the only way to secure a website. But this isn't about securing websites, this is about forcing us to rely on CAs.