4 ms·
Sure. You could also replace the term “monorepo” with “separate repos” and your statement would be just as valid. Either way you go has pros and cons.
by rco8786 8y ago
Sure. You could also replace the term “monorepo” with “separate repos” and your statement would be just as valid. Either way you go has pros and cons.
- hobls 8y agoAgreed. I think the thing is that GitHub basically supports the separate repo approach fairly well out of the box. Using only a single repo requires more thought around your strategy, especially if you have multiple teams.