3 ms·
I'd say that proves my point. The people actually programming the feature or responsible for the thing never push back because the PSC review is more important.
by frgtpsswrdlame 8y ago
I'd say that proves my point. The people actually programming the feature or responsible for the thing never push back because the PSC review is more important. A limp-wristed "push back" that never materializes at the most crucial moment - when you are asked to do something unethical - isn't really push back at all.
- gowld 8y agoI read that at Facebook anyone can build any feature. Is that true? Was that true in the past?
- nextlevelwizard 8y agoWhat push back have you offered for "something unethical"? It is easy to be armchair activist who doesn't have to actually put their neck on the line. On HN a lot of people talk about how people should just resign instead of implementing something "immoral", but never take into account that people have debt and lives to live and while you might lose sleep over a piece of code you wrote at least you won't go hungry or die of exposure in ultimately futile effort at stopping the feature, since the company will always find someone who needs money badly enough to complete the job.
- frgtpsswrdlame 8y agoI haven't. Like I said in my original comment I don't believe employees actually have the power to push back here. The corporation is too powerful. I'm not armchair activisting.