4 ms·
I wonder if it's a 4k screen generating 45 different views in alternating locations on the screen. Thus your new resolution is like 720x256. From the videos th
by xori 8y ago
I wonder if it's a 4k screen generating 45 different views in alternating locations on the screen. Thus your new resolution is like 720x256.
From the videos they look higher res than that.
- nv-vn 8y agoIt's like 2560x1600 interlaced
- xori 8y agoThat leaves even less resolution, in what orientation are they using the lenticular lens then? It must be less than 45 unique views and they smear between them.
- bufferoverflow 8y agoIt's a lightfield display, not a lenticular display. Lightfield lens bumps go in two spacial directions: http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/lightfield/leslie-holding-bumpy-sheet.jpg http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/lightfield/leslie-hold... http://real-eyes.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Technologie_01.jpg http://real-eyes.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Technologie_0... I guess in their case the microlenses aren't even round, since 45 is 5*9. I guess they have 9 horizontal X 5 vertical pixels per microlens.
- xori 8y agoIf you were smart you could encode multiple views into a single pixel to get a higher resolution, but then I figure that would limit your colour depth availability.
- hughes 8y agoHow would encoding multiple view into a single pixel work with a lenticular display? There needs to be a physical distance between each of the views.
- opticalflow 8y agoThis is not a lenticular display. It's a stack of 45 independent transparent TFTs.
- childintime 8y agoIf the screen were selectable between 4k and lo res 3D modes, that would be superb.