4 ms·
I am skeptical there will be an 'Event', something more like a gradual decline seems more likely (so, more British Empire than Roman). But if there were a compl
by blacksmith_tb 8y ago
I am skeptical there will be an 'Event', something more like a gradual decline seems more likely (so, more British Empire than Roman). But if there were a complete collapse, I doubt your preparations could be really save you. Or in other words, it isn't the apocalypse if you can survive it.
- arethuza 8y agoThe British Empire was at its peak in 1922 and was largely gone by the 1960s - I think that is actually rather faster than the decline of the Roman Empire! edit: 1992 to 1922
- sp332 8y ago-
- DoreenMichele 8y agoI assume they mean 1892. But, I dunno, maybe time travel is a thing, even at the global level. ;)
- davidw 8y agoI think the point is that people in the UK are mostly happy, healthy and better off in many ways than when there was an actual empire. That's not true of a lot of places when things 'go south'.
- Sangermaine 8y ago>I am skeptical there will be an 'Event', something more like a gradual decline seems more likely (so, more British Empire than Roman). I'm not sure what you mean by this. The (Western) Roman Empire's decline was not caused by "an Event" either, it was a gradual process with many causes over several centuries.
- blacksmith_tb 8y agoYes, we have an overly simple picture of Visigoths etc. - I meant to suggest a scenario where there isn't chaos after empire, just a sort of reduced set of circumstances.
- ForRealsies 8y agoAdam's law of Slow-moving diasters: 'Whenever humanity can see a slow-moving disaster coming, we find a way to avoid it.'