6 ms·
That rider sounds to me like the ATM itself has to be compromised. It wasn't. The hack was upstream and the ATM was just doing what the network rules told it to
by darkstar999 8y ago
That rider sounds to me like the ATM itself has to be compromised. It wasn't. The hack was upstream and the ATM was just doing what the network rules told it to.
- zokier 8y agoNo, it just says that the ATM must be involved in the loss, they need to be the cause or the source of the loss. And I think it is pretty well arguable that ATMs were involved in this case, even if in relatively minor role.