4 ms·
Not to mention that there is no conclusive evidence of the dual process theory yet, see for example this experimental study finding that logical "type 2" answer
by sophistication 8y ago
Not to mention that there is no conclusive evidence of the dual process theory yet, see for example this experimental study finding that logical "type 2" answers are actually typically faster and that intuitive "type 1" answers are typically also logical:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027716302542 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001002771...
- naasking 8y ago> Not to mention that there is no conclusive evidence of the dual process theory yet Define "conclusive". There is considerable evidence for this dual reasoning mode. As for your study, system 1 thinking is not inherently illogical. In fact, it's necessarily logical otherwise it would be maladaptive. The point is that it's logical in a "lossy" way that sometimes excludes pertinent information for speed of response, and so sometimes goes wildly wrong.