3 ms·
Not really. I know pros who exclusively use Olympus gear in their studio. Olympus Pro lenses are of the very highest quality (and priced accordingly) and the im
by petepete 8y ago
Not really. I know pros who exclusively use Olympus gear in their studio. Olympus Pro lenses are of the very highest quality (and priced accordingly) and the image quality is right up there.
In certain situations, like when light is low, larger sensors have the edge. But, compare a modern APS-C or MFT sensor to one of ten years ago and the performance gulf in low light is huge.
For the record, I'm a Nikon user that's very tempted by Fuji.
- renjimen 8y agoAt the pro-level it sounds like they're comparable, but at least in my price range DSLRs seem to give better value for money. I'm currently using a Nikon D7100 and was looking into switching to mirrorless, primarily to save on weight as I mainly do travel photography. I couldn't see anything out there that rivaled it for a similar amount to what I paid for the D7100 4 years ago. I put the money into the awesome Nikkor AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8G ED instead. It did nothing but exacerbate my weight problems though! Hah
- tormeh 8y agoI have the Olympus M10 mark III for the same reasons you want a new camera. It's pretty good. The only thing I really miss is a persistent Bluetooth connection to my smartphone instead of the ugly WiFi solution this camera has.