4 ms·
I didn't say defense lawyers are "appointed from a government-funded pool." I said many are "appointed," which is the term used in Gideon v. Wainright and Mira
by Digory 8y ago
I didn't say defense lawyers are "appointed from a government-funded pool." I said many are "appointed," which is the term used in Gideon v. Wainright and Miranda. "Appointed" covers public defenders and assigned counsel. Both are (under)paid from government funds, but their attorney-client obligations run to the accused, not the government.
As for the the rest, "the Defense bar"[0] and "Plaintiff's lawyers"[1] are pretty common terms. Sorry if your speciality is left out. The point is that a lawyer's responsibilities to clients will get hairy if they try to play both sides of common divides like prosecution/(criminal)defense and plaintiff/(corporate) defense.
[0] https://www.dri.org/ https://www.dri.org/
[1] https://www.google.com/search?q=plaintiff%27s+lawyer+site%3Awsj.com https://www.google.com/search?q=plaintiff%27s+lawyer+site%3A...
- gamblor956 8y agoI'm a lawyer...I've practice both as a public defender and in civil litigation. You're technically correct about everything you've cited but still completely wrong about your conclusion. Lawyers are professionals, and while you will get a few bad apples who play politics, the overwhelming majority of them will have no problem representing both sides--as long as it's in different cases. (Professional has a specific legal meaning in the US, meaning at a very high level that lawyers have ethical obligations to their clients.)