Irrelevant. We're concerned here about the edge cases. Yes, sure, there's a lot of obviously guilty people that get charged for the obviously illegal and obvi

Irrelevant. We're concerned here about the edge cases. Yes, sure, there's a lot of obviously guilty people that get charged for the obviously illegal and obviously immoral thing they obviously did, and then they get the obvious punishment, fine, great. > DAs don’t make a career of threatening trials for cases that aren’t locks. That's not remotely the same thing as "no DAs ever threaten trials for cases that aren't locks". That does happen, all the time, and to the people who get caught up in it, the fact that the DA doing it isn't making a career of it is cold comfort. It also doesn't consider a wide number of other structural issues involved with prosecutor discretion, or with the systemic imbalances in the system, as discussed in, eg, the linked article.