I find GitLab's upgrade tiers oddly chosen and quirkily implemented: * The features don't seem to follow the costs of running them. I.e., they're economically

I find GitLab's upgrade tiers oddly chosen and quirkily implemented: * The features don't seem to follow the costs of running them. I.e., they're economically inefficient. This makes GitLab less competitive. E.g., Some features held back for higher paying customers feel arbitrary in the sense that it's a marketing decision, not an ops/cost decision. * Permanent nag text and nag links - annoying.