4 ms·

>How do you go from director at 59 to filing bankruptcy in fewer than two year after losing your job? Fiscal irresponsibility This is a very entitled and selfi

>How do you go from director at 59 to filing bankruptcy in fewer than two year after losing your job? Fiscal irresponsibility This is a very entitled and selfish statement. The act of simply existing is very expensive in the USA, and if you have children or have unexpected medical bills that can be tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands, you can easily eat through all of your savings very quickly and not be able to pay back debts I'm sure they could pay before they were laid off.

dsfyu404ed 8y ago
>The act of simply existing is very expensive in the USA Someone who lives a lifestyle one typically associates with someone who's employment can be describes as "own office, secretaries and assistants, along with titles like “director” that spoke to her decades of experience" will become impoverished if they lose and do not quickly replace that job on any continent. It's not just a US thing.
- AnimalMuppet 8y ago
  But it's a choice to live that lifestyle. Doing so is implicitly assuming that you will always have that income level - which is rather unwise to assume.
tonyedgecombe 8y ago
This is a very entitled and selfish statement. It doesn't take a huge imagination to realise the unexpected could happen, especially at that age. If you have had a reasonable career in a well paying job then it is irresponsible not to put something away for a rainy day.
- dragonwriter 8y ago
  2 years is a lot of rainy days.
- citizenkeen 8y ago
  In the United States, a bad medical problem can cost five-to-ten years' salary. That's one hell of a rainy day fund. https://www.cnbc.com/id/100840148 https://www.cnbc.com/id/100840148
  - tonyedgecombe 8y ago
    The article didn't mention a bad medical problem, rather some low level issues. I'm not sure using the lack of socialised health care as an excuse for not managing your finances is sensible. It's only a minority that need expensive health care before 65 but it seems it's the majority who aren't managing to live within their means.

dsfyu404ed 8y ago

>The act of simply existing is very expensive in the USA Someone who lives a lifestyle one typically associates with someone who's employment can be describes as "own office, secretaries and assistants, along with titles like “director” that spoke to her decades of experience" will become impoverished if they lose and do not quickly replace that job on any continent. It's not just a US thing.

AnimalMuppet 8y ago
But it's a choice to live that lifestyle. Doing so is implicitly assuming that you will always have that income level - which is rather unwise to assume.

tonyedgecombe 8y ago

This is a very entitled and selfish statement. It doesn't take a huge imagination to realise the unexpected could happen, especially at that age. If you have had a reasonable career in a well paying job then it is irresponsible not to put something away for a rainy day.

dragonwriter 8y ago
2 years is a lot of rainy days.
citizenkeen 8y ago
In the United States, a bad medical problem can cost five-to-ten years' salary. That's one hell of a rainy day fund. https://www.cnbc.com/id/100840148 https://www.cnbc.com/id/100840148
- tonyedgecombe 8y ago
  The article didn't mention a bad medical problem, rather some low level issues. I'm not sure using the lack of socialised health care as an excuse for not managing your finances is sensible. It's only a minority that need expensive health care before 65 but it seems it's the majority who aren't managing to live within their means.