> But I do emphasize respecting its use in a profound way. You did not emphasize in any profound way. You did imply though that it invariably changes everyone

> But I do emphasize respecting its use in a profound way. You did not emphasize in any profound way. You did imply though that it invariably changes everyone, and never was anyone you know changed for the worse. So it changes everyone for the better. But you ask, surely because you are not sure, whether those who were crazy afterwards had to be crazy to begin with. So, the only thing you really emphasized was your ignorance. What does that mean to you? Everyone is a little crazy to begin with. Thus estimates about sanity are rather distorted and a small sample group not enough, especially if you are biased by preoccupation.