5 ms·
Results look nice, but it seems to only excel at solid colours and gradients, anything with detail is smoothed out. Which admittedly looks nicer than the classi
by xori 8y ago
Results look nice, but it seems to only excel at solid colours and gradients, anything with detail is smoothed out. Which admittedly looks nicer than the classic jpg artifacts.
http://xooyoozoo.github.io/yolo-octo-bugfixes/#abandoned-factory&jpg=s&bpg=s http://xooyoozoo.github.io/yolo-octo-bugfixes/#abandoned-fac...
I think the above link shows it best. Not only does the jpg get better details in the middle walls and broken windows, but it's also smaller. But the BPG gets the blue sky gradient without banding and artifacts.
- mark-r 8y agoThanks for the link. Are you sure the details you're seeing in the jpg aren't just artifacts? There's only one thing I see in the middle wall that I am confident is supposed to be there in the jpg. The nature of lossy compression is that you need to decide where the losses will be. I think BPG is making the right choices.