3 ms·
>The first is a feeling (or a will). People can vote for or against it. The second is presented as a reasoned argument based on facts, which nobody of the masse
by maroonblazer 8y ago
>The first is a feeling (or a will). People can vote for or against it. The second is presented as a reasoned argument based on facts, which nobody of the masses can really verify (and none did, before the fact).
It is verifiable though, at least in principle. WMDs either exist or they do not. Feelings have no comparable feature.
- coldtea 8y ago>It is verifiable though, at least in principle. WMDs either exist or they do not. Feelings have no comparable feature. No, but as ultimately everything is based of feelings and wills (where would those value judgements necessary to reason would come from? Reason is totally neutral, annihilation of the other is the same to it as solidarity, given the right axioms), naked feelings can at least be judged as what they are.