Reputability should never be reason not to question something. There's a name for that and it's appeal to authority. Is Reuters reputable enough to question th

Reputability should never be reason not to question something. There's a name for that and it's appeal to authority. Is Reuters reputable enough to question the sensationalism in WSJ? http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/02/26/the-sensationalist-wsj-2/ http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/02/26/the-sensati...: "In any case, it’s clear from the photograph and the two main stories on the WSJ’s front page that the paper is aggressively becoming both sensationalist and political. That might be a sensible move, from the point of view of selling copies, especially on the newsstand. But it will also inevitably serve to erode the trust that many people, on Wall Street especially, have in the reporting of the WSJ."