It's disingenuous to associate yourself as a "reader" when you evidently didn't read the article carefully: "Tesla declined to comment on the specific memo. Bu

It's disingenuous to associate yourself as a "reader" when you evidently didn't read the article carefully: "Tesla declined to comment on the specific memo. But it confirmed it is seeking price reductions from suppliers for projects, some of which date back to 2016, and some of which haven’t been completed." The second source the WSJ found was Tesla itself. Uninformed assertion does not make for a proper, useful Hacker News comment.