3 ms·
Having worked in television, "atmos" is a semi-technical term with a specific flavor and specific baggage. This article uses it reasonably (but not entirely) a
by RiderOfGiraffes 16y ago
Having worked in television, "atmos" is a semi-technical term with a specific flavor and specific baggage. This article uses it reasonably (but not entirely) accurately.
- pvg 16y agoAh, so you're saying it's a silly affectation rather than an abbreviation.
- RiderOfGiraffes 16y agoIn the contexts where I've worked it's a genuine piece of jargon, a technical term that implies more than would the term "atmosphere". So when used in that context yes, it's not just an abbreviation, but no, it's not a silly affectation. It's interesting that PG's usage matches (closely enough) the baggage-laden jargon version.
- pvg 16y agoRight, I meant out-of-context usage (if that's what this is) would be a silly affectation like if one started inserting technical sailing terms into one's speech for no good reason, arrr.