3 ms·
If SF wants to attract developers, they should support alternative version control systems like fossil and darcs. I can't think of any reason to use SF for a ne
by bachmeier 8y ago
If SF wants to attract developers, they should support alternative version control systems like fossil and darcs. I can't think of any reason to use SF for a new project except possibly that you use mercurial and don't like bitbucket. The market for git hosting is extremely competitive and they don't bring much to the table.
- rhabarba 8y agoThey also have SVN. There are not many SVN hosters left. A good competitor for Darcshub would be appreciated though.
- gtirloni 8y agoThat means a UI that has to take into account the idiosyncrasies of different tools. It seems like a recipe for disaster, if focus is what SF needs now.
- rhabarba 8y agoIt works for Bitbucket (Mercurial and Git, although they don't advertise Mercurial nearly as much as Git).