3 ms·
My first take on the article was that it would be overwrought feminist apologizing for fraud. It seems considerably more interesting, and plausible, than that.
by rossdavidh 8y ago
My first take on the article was that it would be overwrought feminist apologizing for fraud. It seems considerably more interesting, and plausible, than that. But, of course, I have no way of knowing how true.
- greenyoda 8y agoI think the article could be a warning to anyone who starts a company, regardless of their gender: "Fear of doubt meant Holmes fired all doubters, thus guaranteeing the failure of Theranos." If a CEO is so insecure that they can't tolerate employees' doubts about the direction of the company, they probably shouldn't be leading a company. And if investors tolerate a CEO firing anyone who doesn't blindly follow the agenda, the investors aren't exercising enough due diligence.