3 ms·
There exists companies that don't subsidize employee meals. If he proposed to simply stop subsidizing food completely, this would be a non-story. There are oth
by lucideer 8y ago
There exists companies that don't subsidize employee meals. If he proposed to simply stop subsidizing food completely, this would be a non-story.
There are other publications calling this a "ban" on meat; nothing is being banned.
The hyperbolic reaction here is pretty shocking. Seems the idea of vegans being the "holier than thou" ones is a severe case of projection.
- that_guy1 8y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,....
- lucideer 8y agoI'm not sure what applicability this link has here? It seems unrelated. What am I missing? (genuine question, no tongues in cheeks, I don't see the connection) Edit: Upon further thought, I think maybe you're agreeing with me and saying that Burwell vs Hobby Lobby gives precedent to WeWork being entitled to do this? Legally, maybe, but it seems specially concerned with religious affiliation, which vegatarianism isn't, so I don't think it would apply. It also presumes you agree with the Burwell vs Hobby Lobby decision; some people might not. It's a fair comparison, but I don't think it holds water. I just think what WeWork is doing is fine because employees aren't morally entitled to free food from their employer.